Consultation on IBOR fallbacks: Question 1

On 12 July 2018, ISDA has published a Consultation on Certain Aspects of Fallbacks for Derivatives Referencing GBP LIBOR,1 CHF LIBOR, JPY LIBOR, TIBOR, Euroyen TIBOR and BBSW.

I'm preparing a quant perspective on IBOR fallback proposals that I will publish in the coming days.

In the mean time, by reading the consultation document, I have a certain number of questions related to the clarification of the wording or the formulas proposed. I'm sending the questions to the ISDA email associated to the consultation and I'm also posting them here. I will update the post when I have an answer or a clarification. This is

Game of Benchmarks: Season 2



Game of Benchmarks: Season 2 - Episode 1: Compounded Setting in Arrears Rate question

 

Question related to Option 3: Compounded Setting in Arrears Rate

 

The three dates that characterise a IBOR fixing are its fixing date, the effective date of the underlying deposit and the maturity date of the same deposit. When used in derivatives, the effective and maturity dates of the underlying deposit are theoretical dates as no actual deposit takes place. Derivatives payments are themselves characterised by four dates: the fixing date, the start accrual date, the end accrual date and the payment date.

The consultation document indicates "The fallback could be to the relevant RFR observed over the relevant IBOR tenor and compounded daily during that period.” A formula is provided in Annexe A.

It is not clear if the “period” referred in the text (T to T+f in the annexe) is the IBOR theoretical deposit period or the derivative period.

If the period refers to the IBOR theoretical deposit period: How would the RFR for the period been know if the payment takes place before the end of the said deposit period. This would be the case for FRA with “FRA discounting” settlement (settlement in advance), for IBOR with fixing in-arrear or for vanilla floating coupons on coupons after a period with end accrual date on a non-good business day.

If the period refers to the derivative period: Does that mean that the same IBOR fixing will fallback on different values depending in which derivative it is referred and the consistency between rates fixing on the same date will be broken? What would be the period for a FRA that settles on the fixing date (e.g. GBP-LIBOR)?

Edit on 6-Oct-2018:

I have received an answer from ISDA regarding the above question:
This is an issue that we are going to need to look into for each of the relevant currencies as we move to implementation (if we move to implement the compounded in arrears rate).  The likely answer is the IBOR theoretical period with an adjustment for the payment date but it would be helpful if you could point out this issue in your response and explain the implications.


Season 2: The questions

 

Question 1: Question related to Option 3: Compounded Setting in Arrears Rate

Question 2: Question related to: Description of Fallbacks - Triggers

Question 3:  Description of Adjusted RFR - Timing

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Multi-curve framework book: new edition in progress

Image
Subject: Interest Rate Modelling in the Multi-curve Framework: Foundations, Evolution, and Implementation It has been more than 10 years since I wrote the first edition of the multi-curve framework book. What happened in those 10 years? Why did it take me so long to start a new version? It took me roughly 10 years to write the first edition. The reason it took so long at that time, was that I did not know that I was writing it! I thought I was writing a couple of pages on an obscured and theoretical idea that there was not a `` one curve to rule them all '' but multiple curves. It turned out that it became the actual practice for very clear and important reasons. That was the excuse for the first edition, what is the excuse for the second edition? Since the first edition, many things happen, in particular: March 2015: BCBS - IOSCO: margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives and mandatory variation margin July 2017: The future of LIBOR -- actually it
Read more

Rigged: part 1 - Will there be a part 2?

Image
I have been reading book “Rigged: The Incredible True Story of the Whistleblowers Jailed after Exposing the Rotten Heart of the Financial” (Andy Verity, Flint, June 2023) for some time. It was published several month ago, but I just finished it. To my defence, I have to say that I don’t feel comfortable reading fiction where the “bad guys” are systematically winning by cheating. The book is the story of the miscarriage of justice done in the LIBOR manipulation story. The book content did not surprise me. For anybody having worked on a (swap) trading desk, it is clear that what was described by the accusation was impossible. It is not possible for some middle level trader to create a multi-year, multi-desk, multi-bank international conspiracy over open lines, broker lines, on open offices etc. without all around them, including compliance and senior management to be fully aware of what is going on. Moreover the regulators cannot be ignorant of the situation, except pleading complete in
Read more

A personal statement on the IOSCO Statement on Alternatives to USD Libor

IOSCO has issued a document called “Principles for Financial Benchmarks” in 2013. As such it acted as an (unofficial/unelected) lawmaker. On 3 July 2023, the same IOSCO issued a “ Statement on Alternatives to USD Libor ”. The Statement looks like a tribunal judgement from a trial with no public hearing, no witness, and no defense right from a tribunal with no mandate to judge. And publish on the day before Independence Day! Some personal comments on the document. Transparency The statement indicated “Administrators should consider whether to improve the transparency of their rates". The IOSCO document lack minimum transparency. It does not indicate in any way the “varying degrees of vulnerability of concern“ of the analysed benchmarks. The name of the benchmark are not even indicated. This creates a culpability by association to all non-SOFR benchmarks. The statement refers to a Review of Alternatives to USD Libor ; to my knowledge, the review itself is not available. The st
Read more