A polite notice to course and conference organisers

Presenting courses and speaking at conferences is work and also fun for me. I enjoy it and I'm happy to be invited to practitioner and academic events, being public or private (in-house trainings).

My careers includes experiences at senior level as quantitative analyst, trader, risk manager, and academic lecturer, but does not include sandwich man or marketing board.

When presenting courses or seminars, I provide a service to the audience, sharing (part of) my knowledge and personal in depth research. For a one hour seminar, the preparation time is one day, for a one day course, the preparation time is one week. As a (fiercely) independent advisor, that time is not sponsored by any state or outside company.

I speak only at events where a high quality service is provided and the audience is the client (not: the speakers are the clients and the audience is the product); consequently the speakers are selected for their in-depth content, not for their marketing budget.

If you contact me to speak at an event, expect the discussion to be based on the above preliminaries. I'm happy to discuss the subjects that I can present, the location, the length of the presentation and many other variables, but in all cases there will be some constants: I keep a full control of the content (no censor), the content is mine (no presentation in a sponsor's name, no IP transfer) and I'm a service provider (fair retribution).

In particular if in your approach there is something like "you can insert some company pitch in the material" or "this is a senior audience and you can expect return from it", or "we don't have a large budget for this event and expect speakers to be paid by their company marketing budget or to find a grant", please don't call me.

If your are an honest practitioner or academic event organizer that recognizes himself in the above text, don't hesitate to contact me.

Note This notice also applies to marketing and business development intermediaries. Speaking/presenting the results/research/code/tools that I have developed to a paying audience you have selected is also a service I provide to you and requires a fair compensation for my work.

Note 2: Fair retribution includes: a speaker fee to compensate (a very small part of) the research, development and preparation time and full conference related expenses (travel, hotel, meals, etc.).

Related blogs:

Presenting at conferences - 2021-08-26

A(nother) polite notice to course and conference organisers - 2022-08-31

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Multi-curve framework book: new edition in progress

Image
Subject: Interest Rate Modelling in the Multi-curve Framework: Foundations, Evolution, and Implementation It has been more than 10 years since I wrote the first edition of the multi-curve framework book. What happened in those 10 years? Why did it take me so long to start a new version? It took me roughly 10 years to write the first edition. The reason it took so long at that time, was that I did not know that I was writing it! I thought I was writing a couple of pages on an obscured and theoretical idea that there was not a `` one curve to rule them all '' but multiple curves. It turned out that it became the actual practice for very clear and important reasons. That was the excuse for the first edition, what is the excuse for the second edition? Since the first edition, many things happen, in particular: March 2015: BCBS - IOSCO: margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives and mandatory variation margin July 2017: The future of LIBOR -- actually it...
Read more

Rigged: part 1 - Will there be a part 2?

Image
I have been reading book “Rigged: The Incredible True Story of the Whistleblowers Jailed after Exposing the Rotten Heart of the Financial” (Andy Verity, Flint, June 2023) for some time. It was published several month ago, but I just finished it. To my defence, I have to say that I don’t feel comfortable reading fiction where the “bad guys” are systematically winning by cheating. The book is the story of the miscarriage of justice done in the LIBOR manipulation story. The book content did not surprise me. For anybody having worked on a (swap) trading desk, it is clear that what was described by the accusation was impossible. It is not possible for some middle level trader to create a multi-year, multi-desk, multi-bank international conspiracy over open lines, broker lines, on open offices etc. without all around them, including compliance and senior management to be fully aware of what is going on. Moreover the regulators cannot be ignorant of the situation, except pleading complete in...
Read more

Treasury / Swap spreads are negative. And what?

In recent weeks there were several news articles related to the negative treasury/Swap spread. This is in particular the case of a Bloomberg article and a Zero Hedge blog . Some of the “information” in those notes are Swap rates are what companies, investors and traders pay to exchange fixed interest payments for floating ones. That rate falling below Treasury yields […]  is illogical in the eyes of most market observers, because it theoretically signals that traders view the credit of banks as superior to that of the U.S. government. It’s hard to overstate how illogical it is when swap spreads are inverted. That’s because it suggests that governments are less creditworthy than the very financial institutions they bailed out during the credit crisis just seven years ago. Let’s be clear, to me, those claims are purely wrong , nothing is “ illogical ” in negative swap spread. But why do I rant about that in the “multi-curve framework” blog? Because it is exactly the same that ...
Read more