Books' details

Title: Interest Rate Modelling in the Multi-Curve Framework: Foundations, Evolution and Implementation
Editor: Palgrave Macmillan
Series: Applied Quantitative Finance
Author: Marc Henrard
© Marc Henrard 2014
Published: May 2014
Hardcover - 256 pages
ISBN-10: 1137374659
ISBN-13: 978-1137374653

Title: Algorithmic Differentiation in Finance Explained
Editor: Palgrave Macmillan
Series: Financial Engineering Explained
Author: Marc Henrard
© Marc Henrard 2017
Published: September 2017
Softcover - 110 pages
ISBN-10: 3-319-53978-2
ISBN-13: 978-3-319-53978-2

Contacting the author:
Email: marc.p.a.henrard@gmail.com

How to buy the books?


If you meet the author, you can always ask him if he has some (discounted) copies available. Most of his working time is spent at OpenGamma's London offices (256-260 Old Street,  EC1V 9DD ). Don't hesitate to pass by.

This may not be the most convenient way to order the book. Other (online) methods are:

Palgrave Macmillan


Multi-curve framework

Algorithmic differentiation

Amazon


Multi-curve framework: UK or US or France or Germany or Japan (sorry, not in Australia)

Algorithmic Differentiation: UK

Comments

Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fallback compounding in arrears won't work

Image
For more than a year I have been saying that "compounding fixing in arrears" is not an acceptable fallback mechanism for IBOR rates. In the answers to the ISDA consultation, it appears that I was the only respondent to indicate that he was totally opposed to this methodology. My answer to the consultation can be found on my advisory site. I have published a blog about my question on the mechanism when the consultation was announced in July 2018 and detailed the problems in my quant perspective on IBOR fallback consultation results.

Since then I have blogged about it and spoke about it at different seminars and conferences. To date, no public (or private that I'm aware of) comment indicating that there is actually a plan or a workaround to solve the important issues I'm demonstrating have been provided.

Following my presentation at the Quant Summit last Wednesday, Risk.net has published yesterday an article on the subject. From the article, I gather that the other ex…
Read more

Making money on LIBOR fallback (one year later)

Image
At the end of November 2018, I took a GBP (paper) position on my view that LIBOR fallback approach will allow better informed participants to make money (transfer value from) the end-users. I have reported on a regular basis about that position in the first six months (see list of episode at the post bottom). One year later, what happen to that view and to my position?

I'm happy to report that Saint Nicolas brought me a very nice present (Saint Nicolas is an important day in Belgium for good kids like me ;)).

On 29 November 2018, I wrote
The horizon for my position is 29-Nov-2019. Target profit is 5bps x ~2000 GBP/bps = ~10,000 GBP. I cut the position on the earliest of when the market has reached 8.5 bps or on 29-Nov-2019. I'm also expecting a little bit of carry as the current level of realised spread (1 to 3 bps) is below the market basis spread.
Where do I stand today? According to my figures, in term of spread convergence, the spread has decrease by 4.5 basis points (my t…
Read more

Fair LIBOR transition: How low is the regulators' bar?

IBOR transitions (mainly LIBOR transition for the moment) is a huge undertaking for the derivative markets. It implicates many market participants, from large dealer/broker to small end users. Everybody want the transition to be perceived as "fair".

Reading trough the regulator published notes, FAQ and letters, I notice that I don't have the same definition of "fair" than some regulators. This leads to my question in the title: How low is the regulators' bar?

To illustrate my point, I will take two examples, one from the FCA and one from the CFTC.

The italic texts below are extracts from the regulators and ISDA documents, the regular text are my comments.

FCA
The FCA published a "Questions and answers for firms about conduct risk during LIBOR transition".

Treating customers fairly when replacing LIBOR
LIBOR discontinuation should not be used to move customers with continuing contracts to replacement rates that are expected to be higher than what L…
Read more