Making money on LIBOR fallback (end of part 1)

Almost three years ago, on 30 November 2018, just after the results of the first ISDA fallback consultation were published, I explained "how to make money on LIBOR fallback". There were many episodes to the series (see list below) but I never concluded on that first part.

The conclusion came in March 2021 with the publication of the ISDA/Bloomberg fallback spreads. Those spreads have transferred huge amount of money between market participants. I hope you were on the receiving end of the value transfer.

What is the order of magnitude of the money transfer? I don't know, as I don't now the positions of the different market participants. But at least I can tell you how much money you would have made if you had followed my advise from November 2018.

Then I indicated that "I enter into a basis swap where I pay LIBOR-1M v receive SONIA + spread on a 30-year tenor for a notional of 1m. The current spread is at 13.45 bps. My analysis gives me a 4 to 8 basis points range for the fallback spread." My analysis was not perfect as the final spread came at 3.26 bps. It is even better than what I was hoping for. That means a profit of more than 10 bps (almost without risk) on the position. Let's use a 20 PVBP for the 30 year swap to obtain a 200 bps profit on the notional. For each million on the position, the profit is 20,000. If you, as a hedge fund trader, have entered into the position with a notional of 1,000,000 GBP cleared at a CCP, your IM was around 100,000 GBP and your profit around 20,000 GBP. A nice 20% return on the IM over a couple of years. There was some extra P/L due to the carry as explained in some of the previous blogs, but I leave it as a tip to the readers!

This is the end of "Part 1" of the "Making money on LIBOR fallback". There are other parts in the making!

Feel free to contact me for similar analysis or to discuss positions to take advantage of the fallback.


Related blogs:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Multi-curve framework book: new edition in progress

Image
Subject: Interest Rate Modelling in the Multi-curve Framework: Foundations, Evolution, and Implementation It has been more than 10 years since I wrote the first edition of the multi-curve framework book. What happened in those 10 years? Why did it take me so long to start a new version? It took me roughly 10 years to write the first edition. The reason it took so long at that time, was that I did not know that I was writing it! I thought I was writing a couple of pages on an obscured and theoretical idea that there was not a `` one curve to rule them all '' but multiple curves. It turned out that it became the actual practice for very clear and important reasons. That was the excuse for the first edition, what is the excuse for the second edition? Since the first edition, many things happen, in particular: March 2015: BCBS - IOSCO: margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives and mandatory variation margin July 2017: The future of LIBOR -- actually it
Read more

Rigged: part 1 - Will there be a part 2?

Image
I have been reading book “Rigged: The Incredible True Story of the Whistleblowers Jailed after Exposing the Rotten Heart of the Financial” (Andy Verity, Flint, June 2023) for some time. It was published several month ago, but I just finished it. To my defence, I have to say that I don’t feel comfortable reading fiction where the “bad guys” are systematically winning by cheating. The book is the story of the miscarriage of justice done in the LIBOR manipulation story. The book content did not surprise me. For anybody having worked on a (swap) trading desk, it is clear that what was described by the accusation was impossible. It is not possible for some middle level trader to create a multi-year, multi-desk, multi-bank international conspiracy over open lines, broker lines, on open offices etc. without all around them, including compliance and senior management to be fully aware of what is going on. Moreover the regulators cannot be ignorant of the situation, except pleading complete in
Read more

A personal statement on the IOSCO Statement on Alternatives to USD Libor

IOSCO has issued a document called “Principles for Financial Benchmarks” in 2013. As such it acted as an (unofficial/unelected) lawmaker. On 3 July 2023, the same IOSCO issued a “ Statement on Alternatives to USD Libor ”. The Statement looks like a tribunal judgement from a trial with no public hearing, no witness, and no defense right from a tribunal with no mandate to judge. And publish on the day before Independence Day! Some personal comments on the document. Transparency The statement indicated “Administrators should consider whether to improve the transparency of their rates". The IOSCO document lack minimum transparency. It does not indicate in any way the “varying degrees of vulnerability of concern“ of the analysed benchmarks. The name of the benchmark are not even indicated. This creates a culpability by association to all non-SOFR benchmarks. The statement refers to a Review of Alternatives to USD Libor ; to my knowledge, the review itself is not available. The st
Read more